naakt is wat wij zijn, maar dat "zi

naakt is wat wij zijn, maar dat "zijn" is bij velen zo afgedekt, dat je kan veronderstellen dat ze eigenlijk, buiten hun verklede vermommende verschijning, geen "zijn" kunnen laten ontwaren of bezitten

Resultaten (Engels) 1:

nude is what we are, but that "his" is so covered, you can assume that they actually, outside of their costumed vermommende appearance, no "are" able to discern or possess

Resultaten (Engels) 2:

Nude is what we are, but that "his" has been covered by many so that you can assume that they are actually outside their costumed disguising appearance, not "his" able to discern or possess

Resultaten (Engels) 3:

naked is what we are, but that "his" is covered by many people, you can assume that they actually, outside their costumed vermommende appearance, not "see" can make or possess