Het dragen van geweren zal ook zijn

Het dragen van geweren zal ook zijn voorgekomen uit de noodzaak om te jagen in de eerste jaren (alhoewel de Indianen slechts messen en pijl en boog hadden). Maar daarin ligt denk ik ook de oorzaak van geweld: jachtgebieden afbakenen, anderen de pas afsnijden. En dan vooral ook het bont: de Nederlanders die Manhattan kochten van de Indianen voor wat kralen wilden vooral de lucratieve bonthandel in handen krijgen, net als de Engelsen en Fransen.

Resultaten (Engels) 1:

Wearing guns will also have occurred from the need to hunt in the first years (even though the Indians had only knives and bow and arrow). But I also think this is the cause of violence: identify hunting areas, others cut off the pass. And then, above all, the fur: the Dutch who bought Manhattan from the Indians for what wanted to especially the lucrative fur trade beads, just like the English and French.

Resultaten (Engels) 2:

Carrying guns will also be brought about by the need to hunt in the early years (although the Indians had only knives and bows and arrows). But therein lies I think the cause of violence: hunting areas delineating, others cut off the pass. And especially the fur: the Dutch who bought Manhattan from the Indians for some beads especially wanted to get the lucrative fur trade in the hands, like the English and the French.

Resultaten (Engels) 3:

wearing guns will also occurred from the need to hunt in the first years (although the indians only knives and arrows). but i think it is also the cause of violence: define territories, others off. and in particular the fur.the dutch who bought manhattan from the indians for some beads were especially the lucrative fur trade in hands, just as the english and french.